|
Вариант диагностики |
Кодификатор метапредметных результатов обучения |
||
|
№ |
Тип задания |
Код
|
Универсальные учебные действия (УУД) |
|
I |
Проверка читательских умений при работе со сплошным текстом |
6 |
Познавательные действия по работе с информацией и чтению |
|
II |
Проверка умений по работе с графической информацией |
4 |
Познавательные знаково-символические действия |
|
III |
Проверка общелогических умений |
3 |
Познавательные логические действия |
I. Проверка читательских умений при работе со сплошным текстом
In 1861 serfdom, the system which tied the Russian peasants irrevocably to their landlords, was abolished at the Tsar's imperial command. Four years later, slavery in the USA was similarly declared unlawful by presidential order.
Tsar Alexander II (1855-81) shared with his father, Nicholas I, a conviction that American slavery in comparison with Russian one was inhumane.
Indeed, the serfdom that had operated in Russia since the middle of the seventeenth century was technically not slavery. The landowner did not own the serf. This contrasted with the system in the USA where slaves were chattels, that is, they were regarded in law as the disposable property of their masters.
In Russia the traditional relationship between lord and serf was based on land. It was because he lived on his land that the serf was bound to the lord. Peasants in Russia were personally free.
1. Which of these statements are true?
a. There wasn't actually slavery in Russia and the USA.
b. The serfdom in Russia was abolished in 1865.
c. Landowners in Russia didn't let peasants to live on their lands.
d. The presidential order declared unlawful the serfdom in Russia.
e. The serfdom in Russia wasn't technically slavery.
f. The slavery in the USA was abolished in 1865.
g. The peasants in Russia were the property of their landowners.
2. Sort out these historical terms according to the time they were in Russian history.
1649 code of tsar Alexis («Sobornoe Ulozhenie»);
tribute («obrok»);
forced labour («barschina»);
proletariat;
serf («smerd»);
temporarily obliged peasants («vremennoobyazannye»);
charters («ustavnye gramoty»);
sections («otrezki»);
the bourgeoisie
| Before 1861 |
In 1861 |
After 1861 |
II. Проверка умений по работе с графической информацией
Study the map and do the tasks below.
1. Complete an extract from a report based on the map:
After the serfdom was abolished in 1861 the government and landlords (pomeschiki) started separating up their lands between peasants. In such cities as ________________ and ______________ peasants' landholdings were decreased up to 40 %. This provoked one of the most massive uprisings in ______________ village of Penzinskaya province and in __________ village of Kazan province. In Black Earth regions, for instance, in ______________ and _____________ landowners wanted to get as much profit as they could, so they increased the peasants' landholdings more than 20% to let peasants to produce big yields and then to get good money selling their products received as «obrok». We can see that peasant disturbances occurred mostly in the Central Russia. One of the extreme North-east point of it is ______________ province.
2. Use the map to complete the table. Write down the names of provinces in English according to the size of the landholdings.
| Peasants' landholdings decreased from 20% to 40% |
Peasants' landholdings increased up to 20% |
III. Проверка общелогических умений
Use the table and your knowledge of Russian history of 1861 to solve the problems below.
Table 1. Land size in forced labour («barschinnye»), quitrent («obrochnye») and mixed («obrochnye» and «barschinnye») villages of Tambov county.
|
Villages |
Number of peasants before
|
Number of peasants after the 1861 reform |
Land before the 1861 reform |
Average land allotment per peasant before the 1861 reform |
Land after the 1861 reform |
Average land allotment per peasant after the 1861 reform |
|
barschinnye |
24671 |
24652 |
74691,7 |
3,1 |
67863,7 |
2,8 |
|
obrochnye |
1527 |
1527 |
5450,3 |
3,6 |
4398,1 |
2,9 |
|
mixed servitudes («povinnosti») |
767 |
767 |
2127,0 |
2,8 |
1849,3 |
2,4 |
|
Total |
26965 |
26946 |
82269,0 |
3,1 |
74111,1 |
2,8 |
Land allotment is measured in arpents («desyatina»)
1. Using the data from the table calculate the percentage of extra lands («otrezki») which were taken by landowners from the peasants after the 1861 reform. Put your answers into the table below.
| Villages |
the percentage of extra lands (otrezki) |
|
barschinnye |
|
|
obrochnye |
|
|
mixed servitudes («povinnosti») |
Ключи:
1: e, f
2:
| Before 1861 |
In 1861 |
After 1861 |
|
tribute («obrok»);
|
temporarily obliged peasants («vremennoobyazannye»);
|
proletariat;
|
II.
1: After the serfdom was abolished in 1861 the government and landlords (pomeschiki) started separating up their lands between peasants. In such cities as Saratov and Samara peasants' holdings were decreased up to 40 %. This provoked one of the most massive uprisings in Kandeevka village of Penzinskaya province and in Bezdna village of Kazan province. In Black Earth regions, for instance, in Minsk and Kiev landowners wanted to get as much profit as they could, so they increased the peasants' holdings more than 20% to let peasants to produce big yields and then to get good money from them in the form of quitrent (obrok). We can see that peasant disturbances occurred mostly in the Central Russia. One of the extreme North-east point of it is Perm province.
2.
| Peasants' holdings decreased from 20% to 40% |
Peasants' holdings increased up to 20% |
|
Chernigov
|
Mitava
|
III.
1.
| Villages |
the percentage of extra lands (otrezki) |
|
barschinnye |
9 |
|
obrochnye |
19 |
|
mixed servitudes («povinnosti») |
13 |
Источники
1. Валегина К.О. Массовые источники по истории реализации реформы 19 февраля 1861 г. в Тамбовской губернии: опыт количественного анализа структуры наделов и платежей: дис. ... кандидата исторических наук, Санкт-Петербург, 2016. - 208 с.
2. Ковальченко И.Д. Методы исторического исследования / И.Д.Ковальченко; Отделение историко-филологических наук. 2-е изд., доп. - М.: Наука, 2003. - 486 с.